composed of a CMOS chip, an integrated emission filter (see refs. [49,50] for example in
tegrated filters for CMOS fluorescence sensors), DNA probes, and a fluidic cap. The CMOS
integrated circuit itself included an array of 32 × 32 fluorescence detection biosensing
elements.
Each sensing element included an n-well/p-sub photodiode, a first-order current sen
sing modulator and all its required electronics, and a heater for DNA amplification
procedures such as PCR. Each biosensing element was 100 μm × 100 μm, and the pho
todetector was 50 μm × 50 μm. The current sensing modulator was a ΣΔ operator that
enhanced the noise performance significantly. As a proof of concept, the authors de
monstrated the successful detection of a panel of human upper respiratory viruses.
6.6 Conclusions
In this chapter, we discussed several trends in the development of microsystems for
bioelectronics. Specifically, we reviewed CMOS circuits and some of their salient design
aspects as they pertain to the development of neural interfaces, electrochemical sensors,
interfacial capacitance, cell impedance sensors, and image sensors. The devices we dis
cussed all had a common denominator: their engineering featured the confluence of
several fields (e.g., biochemistry, microsystems engineering, cell biology, to name a few).
This illustrates the multi-disciplinary nature of the bioelectronics field and the need for a
co-design approach that leverages insights from various technological and scientific do
mains to provide viable solutions to the many problems addressed.
In closing, we will point the reader to two additional trends in bioelectronics. The first,
which is apparent from some of the exemplary devices we discussed, is the drive towards
multi-modal systems that can support two or more sensing modalities on the same
platform. Such multi-modal devices will enable new capabilities in biospecies analysis
by providing orthogonal sensing capabilities that offer a more complete view of the
microenvironments under study. The second trend is the increasing use of big data and
machine learning techniques to gain additional insights from measured sensor data. We
envision that bioelectronics hardware will be rendered more effective when combined
with the power of machine learning algorithms capable of identifying and classifying
signal patterns that are consistent with biophysical or biochemical cues of interest.
References
1. B. Bonaz, V. Sinniger, and S. Pellissier, “Therapeutic potential of vagus nerve stimulation for
inflammatory bowel diseases.” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, 2021, pp. 1–16.
2. Z. Luo and M.D. Ker. “A high-voltage-tolerant and precise charge-balanced neuro-stimulator
in low voltage CMOS process.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 10, no.
6, 2016, pp. 1087–1099.
3. J.M. Aran, Z. Y. wu, Y. Cazals, R.C. de Sauvage, and M. Portmann, “Electrical stimulation of
the ear: Experimental studies.” Annals of Ontology, Rhinology & Laryngology, vol. 92, no. 6,
1983, pp. 614–620.
104
Bioelectronics